Previously Anthony Towns wrote: > Is there any reason the bugs against dpkg-iwj haven't been reassigned > back to dpkg and closed? Is it not the case that dpkg-iwj is officially > a dead tree and the bugs being open serve no purpose but to inflate the > bug count and make the various bug processing scripts take longer? Ian said he would close them in the near future. Wichert. -- _________________________________________________________________ / Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool \ | wichert@wiggy.net http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ | | 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
Attachment:
pgpDK5_jkYRXR.pgp
Description: PGP signature