Bug#51920: marked as done (dpkg: [C]onfigure and [R]emove are no longer necessary (sp?))
Your message dated Sun, 5 Dec 1999 03:53:17 +0100
with message-id <19991205035317.A9909@mors.net>
and subject line Bug#51920: dpkg: [C]onfigure and [R]emove are no longer necessary (sp?)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Dec 1999 20:23:52 +0000
Received: (qmail 6741 invoked from network); 4 Dec 1999 20:23:49 -0000
Received: from gama.web4u.com.br (200.244.50.4)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 4 Dec 1999 20:23:49 -0000
Received: from cesarb2.cesarb.personal (mail@nas0d24.web4u.com.br [200.244.50.217])
by gama.web4u.com.br (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA10539;
Sat, 4 Dec 1999 18:27:28 -0200
Received: from cesarb by cesarb2.cesarb.personal with local (Exim 3.03 #1 (Debian))
id 11uLiU-0001JT-00; Sat, 04 Dec 1999 18:23:38 -0200
From: cesarb@web4u.com.br
Subject: dpkg: [C]onfigure and [R]emove are no longer necessary (sp?)
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.2.7
Reply-To: cesarb@web4u.com.br
Message-Id: <[🔎] E11uLiU-0001JT-00@cesarb2.cesarb.personal>
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 1999 18:23:38 -0200
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.6.1
Severity: wishlist
Since with modern package acquisition methods [I]nstall also configures and
removes packages, I don't see much need for [C]onfigure and [R]emove (I see no
need to [A]ccess too, but that's another completely different thread).
-- System Information
Debian Release: potato
Kernel Version: Linux cesarb2 2.2.13 #1 Sat Nov 20 20:59:58 BRST 1999 i586 unknown
Versions of the packages dpkg depends on:
ii libc6 2.1.2-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and timezone
ii libncurses4 4.2-3.4 Shared libraries for terminal handling
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 51920-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Dec 1999 02:42:58 +0000
Received: (qmail 17941 invoked from network); 5 Dec 1999 02:42:57 -0000
Received: from janeway.cistron.net (root@195.64.65.23)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 5 Dec 1999 02:42:57 -0000
Received: from lightning.mors.net (root@wichert.cistron.nl [195.64.66.141])
by janeway.cistron.net (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian/GNU) with ESMTP id DAA18353;
Sun, 5 Dec 1999 03:42:54 +0100
Received: (from wichert@localhost)
by lightning.mors.net (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-6) id DAA09977;
Sun, 5 Dec 1999 03:53:17 +0100
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 1999 03:53:17 +0100
From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@cistron.nl>
To: cesarb@web4u.com.br, 51920-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#51920: dpkg: [C]onfigure and [R]emove are no longer necessary (sp?)
Message-ID: <19991205035317.A9909@mors.net>
References: <[🔎] E11uLiU-0001JT-00@cesarb2.cesarb.personal>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy"
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0pre4i
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] E11uLiU-0001JT-00@cesarb2.cesarb.personal>; from cesarb@web4u.com.br on Sat, Dec 04, 1999 at 06:23:38PM -0200
--gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Previously cesarb@web4u.com.br wrote:
> Since with modern package acquisition methods [I]nstall also configures a=
nd
> removes packages, I don't see much need for [C]onfigure and [R]emove (I s=
ee no
> need to [A]ccess too, but that's another completely different thread).
I disagree. Apt is not mandotary. Not everybody uses apt.
Wichert.
--=20
________________________________________________________________
/ Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \
| wichert@liacs.nl http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
--gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEARECAAYFAjhJ050ACgkQPLiSUC+jvC3wFQCgi4qLv1bUQzMvTKTyNuZFyfJ9
eYoAn3wRZNLyvLFMCeUsLaG62bvmY4Aw
=dZCK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy--
Reply to: