[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#37254: dpkg: update-alternatives madness

Previously Julian Gilbey wrote:
> Do we need to then specify this in the policy manual, or will it be
> sufficient to file bugs against packages which don't have the needed
> update-alternatives in their prerm?

No need to put this in the policy manual. The policy manual is for
policies, not for guidelines to make packages.


 / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience  \
| wichert@liacs.nl                    http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0  2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |

Attachment: pgpCJq6rGot47.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: