Bug#6394: marked as done (dpkg: dselect's treatment of Recommends)
Your message dated Sun, 10 Oct 1999 02:14:10 -0400
with message-id <19991010021410.E18835@lappy.djj.state.va.us>
and subject line some dpkg bug maintainence with permission from wichert
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jan 1997 21:12:52 +0000
Received: (qmail 1360 invoked from network); 2 Jan 1997 21:12:49 -0000
Received: from kite.preferred.com (HELO kite.ml.org) (email@example.com)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 2 Jan 1997 21:12:46 -0000
Received: by kite.ml.org
(Debian Smail-3.2 1996-Jul-4 #2); Thu, 2 Jan 1997 16:11:17 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 1997 16:11:17 -0500 (EST)
From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Joey Hess)
Subject: dpkg: dselect's treatment of Recommends
There has seemed to be agreement on debian-devel in the past that dselect
should treat "recommends" more like "suggests" and less like "depends".
Currently, if you have a package that is recommended by another package,
and you don't want to install the recommended package, dselect will flag
the recommended package for installation each time you go to Select
This has lead to lots of ugly hacks like making a local package that is
empty and provides the reccommended package.
I suggest that dselect be changed to handle recommends more like it
currently handles suggests.
Received: (at 1037-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Oct 1999 06:12:48 +0000
Received: (qmail 18194 invoked from network); 10 Oct 1999 06:12:46 -0000
Received: from ppp28.ts1-3.newportnews.visi.net (HELO lappy.djj.state.va.us) (126.96.36.199)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 10 Oct 1999 06:12:46 -0000
Received: from bmc by lappy.djj.state.va.us with local (Exim 3.03 #1 (Debian))
id 11aCFG-00038m-00; Sun, 10 Oct 1999 02:14:10 -0400
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 1999 02:14:10 -0400
From: Ben Collins <email@example.com>
To: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com,
Subject: some dpkg bug maintainence with permission from wichert
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
1685: dpkg-split command line parsing.
My take on this, the options expected aren't in a compatible format,
so it can't be made GNU style. Also the man page shows that the
complained about format is expected. IMO, if it's documented as such,
then it should be acceptible. GNU is not the endall argument format.
16217: prompting for clearing avail on updates in dselect
dselect doesn't seem to do this anymore
10263: segfaults on upgrade
Very old bug concerning libc5->libc6 upgrades. I don't think we have any
way to really reproduce it, plus the reports show that the cause was
possibly found from some dependencies, but the original poster never
4074: conffile's left behind
Not a current problem with dpkg it seems
1037: dselect help screen
Ian said he would fix this in the report when he released the C version of
dpkg, that seems to have occured (bug report is vague on what the actual bug
is, and attempts at clarifying have failed).
Ben....more to come