[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1037: marked as done (dselect user interface (was Re: debian 0.93pl5 installation))

Your message dated Sun, 10 Oct 1999 02:14:10 -0400
with message-id <19991010021410.E18835@lappy.djj.state.va.us>
and subject line some dpkg bug maintainence with permission from wichert
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: with rfc822 via encapsulated-mail id 06241652555799;
          Sat, 24 Jun 1995 16:52:55 GMT
>From cus.cam.ac.uk!iwj10 Sat Jun 24 09:51:52 1995
Return-Path: <iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk>
Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp
	(Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0sPYQy-0005hHC; Sat, 24 Jun 95 09:51 PDT
Received: from bootes.cus.cam.ac.uk by pixar.com with SMTP id AA19182
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for debian-user-pipe@mongo.pixar.com); Sat, 24 Jun 1995 09:50:21 -0700
Received: by bootes.cus.cam.ac.uk
	(Smail- #36) id m0sPYQr-000BzaC; Sat, 24 Jun 95 17:51 BST
Received: by chiark
	id <m0sPUZE-0000XqZ@chiark.al.cl.cam.ac.uk>
	(Debian /\oo/\ Smail3.1.29.1 #29.32); Sat, 24 Jun 95 13:44 BST
Message-Id: <m0sPUZE-0000XqZ@chiark.al.cl.cam.ac.uk>
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 95 13:44 BST
From: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson)
To: "Susan G. Kleinmann" <sgk@sgk.tiac.net>
Cc: debian-user@pixar.com
Subject: dselect user interface (was Re: debian 0.93pl5 installation)
X-Debian-Pr: quiet

Package: dpkg

Susan G. Kleinmann writes:
> I looked at the help files for dselect today, and have some suggestions that
> might make them easier to use.
> [suggestions deleted]

Thanks for your comments, they're very helpful.  I know that the user
interface to dselect is rather complicated and perhaps confusing to
the new user.

I'm very receptive to what you're saying, and I'll incorporate most of
your suggestions when I've released the C version of dpkg.  I've filed
this message as a bug to remind me :-).

I'm also considering adding an additional `dumbed down' package
selection interface, which merely presents the packages in order
asking `yes/no/all-in-category/quit/ask-later'-type questions, and
presents information about conflicts and dependencies at that stage
one package at a time.

Ian Murdock writes:
> [...]
> My primary complaint was the lack of mention of the `q' key.  After my
> first encounter with the dependency resolution screen (and after I had
> resolved all dependencies, etc. to my liking), it took a minute or two
> before I realized how to get back to the main selection screen.  [...]

It already does say it in the help text.  Or rather, it tries to.
However, due to a mistake on my part it fails to find the keybinding
and says `[not bound]' instead !

My next main release of dpkg will fix this problem.

Received: (at 1037-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Oct 1999 06:12:48 +0000
Received: (qmail 18194 invoked from network); 10 Oct 1999 06:12:46 -0000
Received: from ppp28.ts1-3.newportnews.visi.net (HELO lappy.djj.state.va.us) (
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 10 Oct 1999 06:12:46 -0000
Received: from bmc by lappy.djj.state.va.us with local (Exim 3.03 #1 (Debian))
	id 11aCFG-00038m-00; Sun, 10 Oct 1999 02:14:10 -0400
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 1999 02:14:10 -0400
From: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>
To: 1685-done@bugs.debian.org, 16217-done@bugs.debian.org,
	10263-done@bugs.debian.org, 4074-done@bugs.debian.org,
Subject: some dpkg bug maintainence with permission from wichert
Message-ID: <19991010021410.E18835@lappy.djj.state.va.us>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0pre2i

1685: dpkg-split command line parsing.
  My take on this, the options expected aren't in a compatible format,
  so it can't be made GNU style. Also the man page shows that the
  complained about format is expected. IMO, if it's documented as such,
  then it should be acceptible. GNU is not the endall argument format.

16217: prompting for clearing avail on updates in dselect
  dselect doesn't seem to do this anymore

10263: segfaults on upgrade
  Very old bug concerning libc5->libc6 upgrades. I don't think we have any
  way to really reproduce it, plus the reports show that the cause was
  possibly found from some dependencies, but the original poster never
  responded back.

4074: conffile's left behind
  Not a current problem with dpkg it seems

1037: dselect help screen
  Ian said he would fix this in the report when he released the C version of
  dpkg, that seems to have occured (bug report is vague on what the actual bug
  is, and attempts at clarifying have failed).

Ben....more to come

Reply to: