Bug#43682: marked as done (dpkg-shlibdeps: should use $? >> 8)
Your message dated Mon, 30 Aug 1999 03:02:45 +0100 (BST)
with message-id <14281.58949.274617.230522@davenant.relativity.greenend.org.uk>
and subject line Bug#43682: dpkg-shlibdeps: should use $? >> 8
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Ian Jackson
(administrator, Debian bugs database)
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Aug 1999 07:30:14 +0000
Received: (qmail 8321 invoked from network); 29 Aug 1999 07:30:13 -0000
Received: from serv1.is2.u-net.net (HELO mserv1b.u-net.net) (195.102.240.137)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 29 Aug 1999 07:30:13 -0000
Received: from [195.102.196.187] (helo=polya)
by mserv1b.u-net.net with esmtp (Exim 2.10 #61)
id 11KzOk-00060B-00
for submit@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 29 Aug 1999 08:29:07 +0100
Received: from jdg by polya with local (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian))
id 11KzBB-0000jM-00; Sun, 29 Aug 1999 08:15:05 +0100
Subject: dpkg-shlibdeps: should use $? >> 8
To: submit@bugs.debian.org ( Debian bug reports)
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 1999 08:15:05 +0100 (BST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL48 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 406
Message-Id: <[🔎] E11KzBB-0000jM-00@polya>
From: Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk>
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.4.0.35
Line 130 of dpkg-shlibdeps checks for the exit status of a command
using $? instead of $? >> 8. This probably happens elsewhere too.
Julian
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see http://www.debian.org/~jdg
Reply to: