On Thu, Jul 29, 1999 at 02:41:32PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote: > > Package `popt' has no sources ... > > These will require further investigation. (I'm offline at the moment). There's an important bug against ftp.debian.org about this one. It's superceded by libpopt0 and libpopt-dev > We have scripts for detecting this sort of thing, but I don't often have > time to run them and fix things. I think your scripts will have to be > able to live with it, because I doubt the archive will ever be completely > happy about source-binary package relationships. You should see how much > bogus output the scripts generate... there's the pcmcia stuff, the libc6.1 > madness, the egcs confusion, the libcompface situation, and lots more fun > for the whole family. Isn't technology wonderful? -- Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org> Debian GNU/Linux developer GnuPG: 2048g/3F9C2A43 - 20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC 44F9 8FF7 D7A3 DCF9 DAB3 PGP 2.6: 2048R/50BDA0ED - E8 D6 84 81 E3 A8 BB 77 8E E2 29 96 C9 44 5F BE -------------------------------------------------------------------------- <dpg> americans are wierd.... <xtifr> californians even weirder <Knghtbrd> xtifr has a point ...
Attachment:
pgpFGJFJPspZt.pgp
Description: PGP signature