[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#17195: marked as done (better handling of config files)

Your message dated Sat, 13 Mar 1999 13:51:32 +0000 (GMT)
with message-id <14058.28004.397431.832691@anarres.relativity.greenend.org.uk>
and subject line conffile handling already sophisticated
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Ian Jackson
(administrator, Debian bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jan 1998 13:02:50 +0000
Received: (qmail 32063 invoked from network); 16 Jan 1998 13:02:47 -0000
Received: from pot.cnuce.cnr.it (root@pot.cnuce.cnr.it@
  by with SMTP; 16 Jan 1998 13:02:47 -0000
Received: by pot.cnuce.cnr.it
	id m0xtBQ1-00081iC
	(Debian Smail- 1997-Dec-8 #2); Fri, 16 Jan 1998 14:02:41 +0100 (CET)
Message-Id: <m0xtBQ1-00081iC@pot.cnuce.cnr.it>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 1998 14:02:41 +0100 (CET)
From: root <root@fly.cnuce.cnr.it>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: better handling of config files
Reply-To: pot@pot.cnuce.cnr.it

Package: dpkg
Severity: wishlist

dpkg should keep a checksum of installet config files.  When
installing a package, it should remind the user that an installed
config file is different from the original one.  Moreover, the default
of whether to overwrite or not should depend on this.

Reply to: