Re: How essential is our custom autoconf hackery?

To: debian-dpkg@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: How essential is our custom autoconf hackery?
From: Guy Maor <maor@ece.utexas.edu>
Date: 16 Feb 1998 21:43:21 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 87g1li3hxi.fsf@1Cust117.max4.los-angeles.ca.ms.uu.net>
In-reply-to: mdorman@debian.org's message of 16 Feb 1998 16:16:37 -0500
References: <Pine.LNX.3.95.980216203128.3605C-100000@odin.waw.com> <ylfjlnvbntca.fsf@boxster.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-shoot-me>

mdorman@debian.org writes:

> Ick, no deadwood, please.  This is what CVS is for.

That only makes sense if we distribute the repository, and not a
tar.gz of the latest source tree.


Guy

Reply to:

debian-dpkg@lists.debian.org
Guy Maor (on-list)
Guy Maor (off-list)

Next by Date: Including Section: and Priority: values in .debs?
Next by thread: Including Section: and Priority: values in .debs?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread