[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1033065: marked as done (release-notes: i386 notes should specify minimum CPU requirements)



Your message dated Mon, 29 May 2023 06:52:22 +0200
with message-id <80b0928c-6ff4-0014-66d9-7657201f3e97@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1033065: release-notes: i386 notes should specify minimum CPU requirements
has caused the Debian Bug report #1033065,
regarding release-notes: i386 notes should specify minimum CPU requirements
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1033065: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033065
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release-notes
Severity: important

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

The release notes for i386 should specify the minimum CPU requirements.

While a kernel compiled for Geode LX (essentially a basic i686 without the optional CPU features) still ships in Debian, many packages enforce CPU flags that barf on anything older than 686-PAE.

One such package is 'sudo' (Bug #1004894) where upstream unilaterally enabled -fcf-protection and the Debian maintainer refuses to comment out the corresponding ./configure macros.

Additionally, other packages apparently disregard build-essentials' GCC defaults and instead configure flags to match the CPU features of the build host, which produces binaries that segfault on a Geode.

Martin-Éric

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=uw4a
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

On 28-05-2023 17:32, Paul Gevers wrote:
On 11-05-2023 20:20, Paul Gevers wrote:
Please review my proposal here:

https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/release-notes/-/merge_requests/166

The release notes now document that the baseline has been bumped.

I ment this message to close the bug, but I failed to adjust the mail To header.

Paul

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---

Reply to: