Re: RFR: release notes update on golang security support
Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 27-05-2021 21:54, Justin B Rye wrote:
>>> + If updates for Go <quote>libaries</quote> are warranted,
>>
>> Missing R in libRaries! (But why in quotes? Should that be
>> <emphasis>?)
>
> These are not libraries in the c-library sense. Can you elaborate when
> you'd expect <emphasis> and when <quotes>? To me <quotes> feels natural,
> <emphasis>, I don't know what it would mean to me in this place.
Well, Perl modules aren't quite libraries in the C-library sense,
either, but we still treat them as library packages. If these ones
will have package names beginning with lib-, I'd call them libraries
without scarequotes. If they're libraries needed only to build
software, rather than at runtime, should we perhaps be saying:
+ If updates are warranted for Go development libraries,
--
JBR with qualifications in linguistics, experience as a Debian
sysadmin, and probably no clue about this particular package
Reply to: