Bug#963964: release-notes: document aufs removal for bullseye

[Justin B Rye <justin.byam.rye@gmail.com>]

Paul Gevers wrote:
>  	  </listitem>
> +	  <listitem>
> +	    <para>
> +	      The <systemitem role="package">aufs-dkms</systemitem>
> +	      package is not part of bullseye. Most <systemitem
> +	      role="package">aufs-dkms</systemitem> users should be
> +	      able to switch to kernel supported
> +	      <literal>overlayfs</literal> to get similar

I think at least "kernel supported overlayfs" should have a hyphen,
possibly a definite article ("to the kernel-supported overlayfs").
Or here's an alternative phrasing:

              able to switch to <literal>overlayfs</literal>, which
              provides similar functionality with kernel support.

> +	      functionality. However, it's possible to have a Debian
> +	      installation on a filesystem that is not compatible with
> +	      <literal>overlayfs</literal>,
> +	      e.g. <literal>xfs</literal> without
> +	      <literal>d_type</literal>. Users of <systemitem
> +	      role="package">aufs-dkms</systemitem> are advised to
> +	      migrate away from <systemitem
> +	      role="package">aufs-dkms</systemitem> before upgrading
> +	      to bullseye.
> +	    </para>
> +	  </listitem>

-- 
JBR	with qualifications in linguistics, experience as a Debian
	sysadmin, and probably no clue about this particular package