[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#987659: marked as done (release-notes: redmine not available, please wait backports)

Your message dated Thu, 13 May 2021 21:25:43 +0200
with message-id <49332638-a433-bbea-9cb3-4bbfc1a444d1@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#987659: release-notes: redmine not available, please wait backports
has caused the Debian Bug report #987659,
regarding release-notes: redmine not available, please wait backports
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
987659: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=987659
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release-notes


Quack,
Sorry for the late request, I entirely forgot. I also hoped it would not be necessary in case 4.2 could work with a few patches but I just finished packaging it and that's not working. 

If not too late, here is the message I wish to convey:
Redmine is unfortunately late migrating over to newer Rails version despite end of upstream support soon (currently only severe security fixes). In Debian we had to update Rails for other applications thus Redmine is not provided in bullseye. We are following upstream closely and will be releasing a version via backports as soon as it is released and we have working packages. Until then you may wait before upgrading, or use a VM or container running Buster to isolate this specific application. 

Regards.
\_o<

--
Marc Dequènes

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi,

On 09-05-2021 06:16, Justin B Rye wrote:
> Paul Gevers wrote:
>> Attached commit ready to push.
> 
> This one needs a bit of work:
> 
>> +    <section id="redmine">
>> +      <!-- buster to bullseye -->
>> +      <title>redmine missing in bullseye</title>
>> +      <para>
>> +	<systemitem role="package">redmine</systemitem> is
>> +	unfortunately late migrating over to newer <systemitem
>> +	role="package">rails</systemitem> version despite end of
>> +	upstream support soon (currently only severe security
>> +	fixes). In Debian we had to update <systemitem
>> +	role="package">rails</systemitem> for other applications thus
>> +	<systemitem role="package">redmine</systemitem> is not
>> +	provided in bullseye. The <literal>Ruby Extras</literal>
> 
> This needs a couple of English fixes, but I think more importantly it
> ought to start by stating the user-visible problem:
> 
>         The package <systemitem role="package">redmine</systemitem> is
> 	not provided in bullseye, as it was too late migrating over from
>         the old version of <systemitem role="package">rails</systemitem>
>         which is at the end of upstream support (receiving fixes for
>         severe security bugs only) to the version which is in bullseye.
> 
>> +	Maintainers are following upstream closely and will be
>> +	releasing a version via <ulink
>> +	url="https://backports.debian.org/backports";>backports</ulink>
>> +	as soon as it is released and they have working packages. Until
>> +	then you may wait before upgrading, or use a VM or container
>> +	running buster to isolate this specific application.
>> +      </para>
>> +    </section>
>> +
> 
> The "You may wait before" bit doesn't work; how about:
> 
>         If you can't wait for this to happen before upgrading, you can
>         use a VM or container running buster to isolate this specific
>         application.

Pushed with these changes.

Paul

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: