[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#950447: Document that persistent journal is now enabled in systemd



On Mi, 31 mar 21, 17:33:47, Justin B Rye wrote:
> Paul Gevers wrote:
> >> On 18-03-2021 11:41, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >>> Yes, the persistent journal is enabled on upgrades and new installations.
> >> 
> >> Thanks.
> >> 
> >>> I'm a bit uncertain, whether I should go into that much detail in the
> >>> release notes, especially wrt to rsyslog. But on the other hand, this
> >>> way our users are notified in advance that this change is coming.
> >> 
> >> I would say, keep it short. I.e. tell we change the default (it only the
> >> default, right?) on upgrades and how it can be disabled again.
> >
> > Did you already have inspiration? We can also try to write up something,
> > but I really appreciate it when maintainers do the initial proposal.
> 
> If nobody knowledgeable has had the time to come up with anything,
> maybe the version attached will inspire either improvements or just an
> urge to replace it with something completely different.
> 
> (The man page pointer should be enough that we don't also need to
> spell out a "disabling the journal HOWTO".)

> diff --git a/en/whats-new.dbk b/en/whats-new.dbk
> index 1e361e61..399e1977 100644
> --- a/en/whats-new.dbk
> +++ b/en/whats-new.dbk
> @@ -182,6 +182,23 @@ linkend="obsolete"/>.
>    </para>
>  </section>
>  
> +<section id="persistent journal">
> +  <title>Persistent systemd journal</title>
> +  <para>
> +    Systemd in bullseye activates its persistent journal functionality
> +    by default, storing its files in
> +    <filename>/var/log/journal/</filename>. See <ulink
> +    url="&url-man;/bullseye/systemd/journald.conf.5.html">journald.conf(5)</ulink>
> +    for details.

To me systemd-journald.service(8) seems like a better introduction.

It's probably also worth mentioning that on Debian the journal is 
readable by members of 'adm', in addition to the default 
'systemd-journal' group.

> +  </para>
> +  <para>
> +    This should not interfere with any existing traditional logging
> +    daemon such as <systemitem role="package">rsyslog</systemitem>, but
> +    users who are not relying on special features of such a daemon may
> +    wish to uninstall it and switch over to using only the journal.
> +  </para>
> +</section>
> +
>  <section id="major-packages">
>    <title>Desktops and well known packages</title>
>  <para>


Kind regards,
Andrei
-- 
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: