[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#931785: marked as done (release-notes: bullseye: security suite renamed to bullseye-security (from buster/updates))

Your message dated Fri, 26 Mar 2021 20:36:48 +0100
with message-id <f84736ac-bd34-08a3-00a9-25007571141c@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#931785: release-notes: bullseye: security suite renamed to bullseye-security (from buster/updates)
has caused the Debian Bug report #931785,
regarding release-notes: bullseye: security suite renamed to bullseye-security (from buster/updates)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
931785: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=931785
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release-notes
Severity: normal

For bullseye, the security suite is now named bullseye-security
instead of buster/updates and users should adapt their sources.list
accordingly when upgrading.

People should probably use something like

  deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye-security main

(adding /debian-security was proposed in [1]).

See [2][3][4] for some more information.

I should probably also sent a mail to d-d-a@ or so about this in the
near future...

Ansgar

  [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2015/12/msg00333.html
  [2] https://bugs.debian.org/614204
  [3] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2015/12/msg00254.html
  [4] https://lists.debian.org/debian-security/2019/06/msg00015.html

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi,

On 26-03-2021 12:39, Justin B Rye wrote:
> Justin B Rye wrote:
>> It looks good, but I'd just made a note to myself that we might also
>> want to mention this in upgrading.dbk where it discusses editing APT
>> sources.  Hoping to send in some patches tomorrow.
> 
> Better late than never.

Pushed.

Paul

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: