[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#928353: marked as done (release-notes: document mutt vs neomutt in buster)

Your message dated Tue, 7 May 2019 21:24:35 +0200
with message-id <40b73f4a-6821-ebf6-4261-b861d8ec1d93@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#928353: Fwd: release-notes: document mutt vs neomutt in buster
has caused the Debian Bug report #928353,
regarding release-notes: document mutt vs neomutt in buster
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
928353: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=928353
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release-notes
X-Debbugs-CC: mutt@packages.debian.org, jmtd@debian.org

Dear (neo|)mutt maintainers,

I recently learned about the mutt versus neomutt situation in buster via
the blog [1] of jmtd (in X-D-CC). I believe mutt and neomutt warrant a
note in the release notes, don't you agree?

As the maintainers of this software, you are in the best position to
write this. Are you willing and able to provide a piece of text? MR
against the release notes archive [2] are welcome, but otherwise just
sent to this bug is fine.

Paul

[1] https://jmtd.net/log/mutt_year_zero/
[2] https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/release-notes/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi Antonio,

I have taken the reviewed text from Justin and committed it to the
release notes.

Thanks

Paul

https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/release-notes/commit/8d337b0

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: