[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#901193: Bug#901003: There is no standard way of removing transitional / dummy packages



On Wed, 2019-03-27 at 22:52 +0000, Vincent.Mcintyre@csiro.au wrote:
[...]
> I agree with everything you've said about this text but as regards
> the patch I think some mention of tracking packages should be kept.
> Something like:
> 
>   One class of dummy package that are not intended to be removed
>   are <quote>tracking</quote> packages, which are used to keep
>   track of the current available version of a program over time.
>   A common case is <literal>linux-image-</literal>-&architecture;.

Why do you want to introduce the term "tracking package" when we
already have the term "metapackage"?

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
I say we take off; nuke the site from orbit.
It's the only way to be sure.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: