--- Begin Message ---
- To: 780573-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#780573: release-notes: Review from the d-i team
- From: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
- Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 09:25:00 +0000
- Message-id: <5a1890b1-a940-0bec-ac0d-80d290a40ac0@thykier.net>
- In-reply-to: <5538979D.8080509@thykier.net>
- References: <20150316073733.4852.7123.reportbug@mangetsu.thykier.net> <20150419200253.77e2b63edc456c106043dc9f@wansing-online.de> <20150419181727.GA4861@mraw.org> <1811184.K2TkeF8kxx@gyllingar> <5538979D.8080509@thykier.net> <5538979D.8080509@thykier.net>
On Thu, 23 Apr 2015 08:56:29 +0200 Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> wrote:
> On 2015-04-20 08:26, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> > Le dimanche, 19 avril 2015, 20.17:27 Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
> >> Holger Wansing <linux@wansing-online.de> (2015-04-19):
> >>> The release-notes currently contain
> >>>
> >>> Graphical installer
> >>>
> >>> Graphical installer is now the default on supported platforms.
> >>> Text installer is still accessible from the very first menu, or if
> >>> the system has limited capabilities.
> >>>
> >>> AFAICS this is not true.
> >>> On the RC3 i386 netinst CD the text installer is still the default.
> >>>
> >>> Remove that paragraph?
> >>>
> >>> debian-boot: please confirm the status.
> >>
> >> Indeed, that was one of the plans for Jessie but the patches only got
> >> pushed a few days ago (IIRC, Didier can correct me if needed), and it
> >> seems a dangerous or at least non-trivial change at this point.
> >
> > That's correct. We're talking about #485586, for which I only pushed
> > patches on 29. March (sorry for thatâ¦). The patches are mostly
> > reorganisation and reordering, but I agree with KiBi: the risks at this
> > point are too high.
> >
> > Cheers, OdyX
> >
>
> Ok, I have removed the paragraph about the graphical installer.
>
> Thanks,
> ~Niels
>
>
>
>
I believe we finished all items for this in time for the jessie release,
so I am closing it (a bit late). :)
Thanks,
~Niels
--- End Message ---