[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#851229: marked as done (net-tools no longer priority important, iproute2 is)

Your message dated Thu, 27 Apr 2017 14:08:56 +0200
with message-id <20170427140856.4a7243f5.baptiste@mailoo.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#851229: net-tools no longer priority important, iproute2 is
has caused the Debian Bug report #851229,
regarding net-tools no longer priority important, iproute2 is
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
851229: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=851229
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release-notes
Severity: wishlist

net-tools's priority has been changed from important to optional while
iproute2 has been upgraded to important.

I think this should be mentioned in the release-notes, ideally along
with a description of the new commands to use for those not familiar
with iproute2.

Reference:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2016/12/msg00604.html

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hello, 

Dixit Baptiste Jammet, le 29/03/2017 :

>>net-tools's priority has been changed from important to optional while
>>iproute2 has been upgraded to important.
>>
>>I think this should be mentioned in the release-notes, ideally along
>>with a description of the new commands to use for those not familiar
>>with iproute2.
>
>I add a line in "obsolete package" section and a full section at the
>end. I didn't find anything in the Debian wiki, so I put a link to the
>debian-reference manual.
>Please review and comment if needed.

As nobody comment since a month, I've commited it in r11442.
Thanks

Baptiste

Attachment: pgpg_HyMLoxw0.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: