Your message dated Thu, 30 Mar 2017 22:05:55 +0200 with message-id <20170330220555.0d1a1ccb.baptiste@mailoo.org> and subject line Re: Bug#810283: jessie: note that armel/iop32x subarch was removed has caused the Debian Bug report #810283, regarding jessie: note that armel/iop32x subarch was removed to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 810283: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=810283 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: jessie: note that armel/iop32x subarch was removed
- From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 15:02:37 -0800
- Message-id: <20160107230237.GA14035@jirafa.cyrius.com>
Package: release-notes I'd like to add a note in the jessie release-notes that the armel/iop32x subarch was removed. I have two questions: 1) Do you think this paragraph should be limited to armel or not? 2) Is there a tag to use for subarchitectures? Any other comments? Index: en/whats-new.dbk =================================================================== --- en/whats-new.dbk (revision 11023) +++ en/whats-new.dbk (working copy) @@ -106,6 +106,13 @@ </listitem> </itemizedlist> +<para arch="armel"> +On <systemitem role="arch">armel</systemitem>, support for the iop32x +subarchitecture was dropped. Other <systemitem +role="arch">armel</systemitem> subarchitectures continue to be supported, +including ixp4xx, kirkwood, orion and versatile. +</para> + <para> Finally, the Debian ports to the FreeBSD kernel, kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386, included as technology previews in Debian 6.0 and Debian 7, are -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 810283-done@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>, Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
- Subject: Re: Bug#810283: jessie: note that armel/iop32x subarch was removed
- From: Baptiste Jammet <baptiste@mailoo.org>
- Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 22:05:55 +0200
- Message-id: <20170330220555.0d1a1ccb.baptiste@mailoo.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 0031348c-0ae1-ed5c-039f-851d5c73ab3b@thykier.net>
- References: <20160107230237.GA14035@jirafa.cyrius.com> <20170329094341.1c2e1229.baptiste@mailoo.org> <20170329094341.1c2e1229.baptiste@mailoo.org> <[🔎] d4f9847e-bb7f-ccb7-7c47-7f67865680f4@thykier.net> <[🔎] 4a91b82bc3ee62b33efa640db96ef7f0@mailoo.org> <[🔎] 0031348c-0ae1-ed5c-039f-851d5c73ab3b@thykier.net>
Hi again, Dixit Niels Thykier, le 30/03/2017 : >That sounds fine with me :) Now reverted in the stretch branche (r11419), and fixed in the jessie one (r11420). And sorry for the noise! BaptisteAttachment: pgpsD0HEZ0ZK3.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---