[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#755000: marked as done (Avoiding gender-specific language)

Your message dated Wed, 16 Jul 2014 16:52:00 -0400
with message-id <53C6E5F0.7020804@tilapin.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#755000: Avoiding gender-specific language
has caused the Debian Bug report #755000,
regarding Avoiding gender-specific language
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
755000: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=755000
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release-notes
Severity: minor
Tags: patch

Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***

   * What led up to the situation?
I was searching for gender-specific language to correct across all the
documentation that is part of DDP

   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
     ineffective)?
grep -r " he " ./* | grep .sgml
grep -r " his " ./* | grep .sgml
grep -r " him " ./* | grep .sgml


   * What was the outcome of this action?
I found some issues and created the patch attached here.


All the best,
Myriam


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.6
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-686-pae (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Index: etch/da/release-notes.da.sgml
===================================================================
--- etch/da/release-notes.da.sgml	(revision 10421)
+++ etch/da/release-notes.da.sgml	(working copy)
@@ -1191,7 +1191,7 @@
 	  installere en af pakkerne <package/kernel-image-*/ eller ved selv
 	  at oversætte en kerne ud fra kildekoden.</p> 
 <!-- JFS: This is not strictly true, if the user was using a non-versioned
-  kernel (kernel-image-2.4-686) he _will_ upgrade the kernel if using
+  kernel (kernel-image-2.4-686) the kernel will_be_upgraded if using
   aptitude (post-sarge) -->
 	  
 	  <![ %available-2.6 [

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hi

Le 16/07/2014 15:16, myr a écrit :
> +++ etch/da/release-notes.da.sgml	(working copy)
> @@ -1191,7 +1191,7 @@
>  	  installere en af pakkerne <package/kernel-image-*/ eller ved selv
>  	  at overs�tte en kerne ud fra kildekoden.</p> 
>  <!-- JFS: This is not strictly true, if the user was using a non-versioned
> -  kernel (kernel-image-2.4-686) he _will_ upgrade the kernel if using
> +  kernel (kernel-image-2.4-686) the kernel will_be_upgraded if using
>    aptitude (post-sarge) -->

That’s a comment (i.e not visible to our users), from a translated file
(I’d assume now handled with po4a), from an old version (etch) not even
built anymore, so nothing to fix here (i.e., please, do not touch those
old files).

Regards

David


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJTxuXwAAoJEAWMHPlE9r086XIIAI/2V5yociaEOyDYuz4ggXLE
+iLS5A/xAiiUSzq+y7vKatDf8gcf/BebaprM4fPL+bQy6fENax208mz8MKMSx29u
X9Tch0pINwE4M8V7RZYPHJo0g75P9JJweobI7iubwvvvLIKlxh8tlVv294pi8sTZ
VWmFwe6wd43ykyWOp57ERBZUKxLgSytzAhNivgRidCGvXlHSftd1GV7vLPeL7IAF
RKqxwqeuZu2DDQx2NAjiv/pIO1uCAB1dQ3pJkYfETuXpoQyb4Gm4y3H8h4P8jP7G
rphkjNWyGbfOOkKfuxEYsV/sdg8GfYhn0qzSke8ZzPo5njbJmoX4iNGCyGqwzSI=
=Ejhx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: