Bug#669726: release-notes: Please document tmpfs filesystem changes for wheezy
On Mi, 24 apr 13, 20:48:50, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[snip]
I didn't notice before, but in my opinion the wording seems to imply
that *all* tmpfs filesystems can be configured in /etc/default/tmpfs.
One small addition should fix that. The attached patch also includes a
missing space[1], to not bother translators twice.
Kind regards,
Andrei
[1] is this not something that could be handled by docbook according to
language specific rules?
--
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic
diff --git a/trunk/release-notes/en/whats-new.dbk b/trunk/release-notes/en/whats-new.dbk
index ea4988f..1ef56eb 100644
--- a/trunk/release-notes/en/whats-new.dbk
+++ b/trunk/release-notes/en/whats-new.dbk
@@ -708,11 +708,11 @@ Pin-Priority: 990</screen>
class='directory'>/var/lock</filename> and <filename
class='directory'>/var/run</filename>. <filename
class='directory'>/lib/init/rw</filename> has been removed, and the others
- have been moved under <filename class='directory'>/run</filename>. <filename
+ have been moved under <filename class='directory'>/run</filename>. <filename
class='directory'>/var/run</filename> and <filename
class='directory'>/var/lock</filename> were configured using
<literal>RAMRUN</literal> and <literal>RAMLOCK</literal> in
- <filename>/etc/default/rcS</filename>. All <literal>tmpfs</literal>
+ <filename>/etc/default/rcS</filename>. All these <literal>tmpfs</literal>
filesystems are now configurable using <filename>/etc/default/tmpfs</filename>;
the old settings are not migrated automatically.
</para>
Reply to: