[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#609029: marked as done (update list of removed packages on upgrade to squeeze)

Your message dated Wed, 1 May 2013 19:25:19 +0200
with message-id <20130501172519.GC12846@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#609029: release-notes: [squeeze] various
has caused the Debian Bug report #609029,
regarding update list of removed packages on upgrade to squeeze
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
609029: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609029
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release-notes
Severity: normal

Dear release-notes maintainers,
doing a lenny->testing upgrade I followed release notes for testing
and noticed a few things that should be clarified:

1) 4.2.5 and 4.2.5.1 mention backports, which are now official. This
section needs an update.
2) 4.6.1 mentions removal od dhcp3 and other packages, but 4.11
doesn't detail them.
3) wishlist: 4.5 recommends apt-get over aptitude as the upgrade
method. Can you please provide a detailed explanation of the
differences? It doesn't have to be a part of release notes, just a
link would be great. Thanks.

Regards,
~~helix84

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 22:47:02 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:

> retitle 609029 update list of removed packages on upgrade to squeeze
> tag 609029 squeeze help
> kthxbye
> 
> On Wed, Jan  5, 2011 at 17:18:14 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Jan  5, 2011 at 16:11:33 +0100, helix84 wrote:
> > 
> > > 2) 4.6.1 mentions removal od dhcp3 and other packages, but 4.11
> > > doesn't detail them.
> > 
> > Yeah that section still needs work.  Patches appreciated.
> > 
> Re-targetting this bug for this issue.  The rest is handled elsewhere
> afaict.
> 
No patch came, so I'm closing this for squeeze.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: