Your message dated Wed, 1 May 2013 11:49:17 +0200 with message-id <20130501094917.GL12846@radis.cristau.org> and subject line Re: Bug#704754: release-notes: [wheezy] mention AppArmor support has caused the Debian Bug report #704754, regarding release-notes: [wheezy] mention AppArmor support to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 704754: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=704754 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: release-notes: [wheezy] mention AppArmor support
- From: intrigeri@debian.org
- Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 15:35:49 +0200
- Message-id: <85fvz5xfpm.fsf@boum.org>
Package: release-notes Severity: normal Hi, I intend to start working today on a paragraph about Wheezy bringing (optional) AppArmor support. I guess it will fit nicely just after the current "2.2.3. Hardened security". Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: intrigeri <intrigeri@debian.org>, 704754-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#704754: release-notes: [wheezy] mention AppArmor support
- From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 11:49:17 +0200
- Message-id: <20130501094917.GL12846@radis.cristau.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 85k3nj82ky.fsf@boum.org>
- References: <85fvz5xfpm.fsf@boum.org> <85bo9tvv83.fsf@boum.org> <[🔎] 85k3nj82ky.fsf@boum.org>
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 11:35:41 +0200, intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > intrigeri wrote (05 Apr 2013 15:43:40 GMT) : > > Please review the attached patch. > > FWIW, I've just verified this patch still applies cleanly on top of > current SVN. Is there anything else I can do to increase the chances > this gets mentioned in the release notes? > Applied in r9841, sorry for the delay, and thanks for the patch! Cheers, JulienAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---