[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#704284: marked as done (release-notes: please call kfreebsd the kernel of FreeBSD, not the FreeBSD kernel)

Your message dated Sun, 31 Mar 2013 08:38:54 -0400
with message-id <51582E5E.9070804@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#704284: release-notes: please call kfreebsd the kernel of FreeBSD, not the FreeBSD kernel
has caused the Debian Bug report #704284,
regarding release-notes: please call kfreebsd the kernel of FreeBSD, not the FreeBSD kernel
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
704284: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=704284
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release-notes
Version: r9650
Tags: wheezy patch

Hi,

To make it crystal clear that Debian GNU/kFreeBSD is not and does not
contain a version of FreeBSD, the kFreeBSD porters have generally been
careful to avoid referring to the kernel in documentation as the
"FreeBSD kernel".  Here's a patch to exercise the same care in the
release notes.

Thanks,
Jonathan

Index: whats-new.dbk
===================================================================
--- whats-new.dbk	(révision 9650)
+++ whats-new.dbk	(copie de travail)
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@
 contains the GNU/kFreeBSD ports ('kfreebsd-amd64' and 'kfreebsd-i386')
 introduced in &debian; squeeze, as a technology preview.  These ports are the
 first ones included in a Debian release which aren't based on the Linux kernel,
-but instead use the FreeBSD kernel with a GNU userland. Users of these versions
+but instead use the kernel of FreeBSD with a GNU userland. Users of these versions
 however should be warned that the quality of these ports is still catching up
 with the outstanding high quality of our Linux ports, and that some advanced
 desktop features are not supported yet. However, the support of common server

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Le 31/03/2013 03:57, Jonathan Nieder a écrit :

> Here's a patch to exercise the same care in the
> release notes.

Applied, thanks

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: