[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#683428: marked as done (release-notes: security status of web browsers in wheezy)

Your message dated Sun, 19 Aug 2012 18:59:46 +0200
with message-id <20120819165946.GC5375@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#683428: release-notes: security status of web browsers in wheezy
has caused the Debian Bug report #683428,
regarding release-notes: security status of web browsers in wheezy
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
683428: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683428
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release-notes
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy help
X-Debbugs-Cc: team@security.debian.org, webkit@packages.debian.org, chromium-browser@packages.debian.org, iceweasel@packages.debian.org

The squeeze release notes had a 'security status of web browsers'
(http://www.debian.org/releases/squeeze/amd64/release-notes/ch-information.en.html#browser-security),
which we need to update for wheezy.  Probably not pretending that
webkitgtk is supported this time.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Mon, Aug  6, 2012 at 22:17:53 +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 10:06:06PM +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
> > On 06/08/2012 21:30, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > > Guiseppe, what are your plans for Chromium in Wheezy? Are you optimistic 
> > > to keep up with security triage and shall we include an additional
> > > recommendation for Chromium?
> > 
> > As we (the security team) discussed some time ago, if we switch to a
> > model, where the current releases are merely rebuild on stable, I can
> > take care of it.
> 
> Great. Updated text below:
> 
Committed in r9314.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: