[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#545420: marked as done ([SQUEEZE] release-notes: Please document Shorewall transition)

Your message dated Thu, 3 Feb 2011 21:10:15 +0100
with message-id <20110203201015.GM10244@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#545420: release-notes: Please document Shorewall transition
has caused the Debian Bug report #545420,
regarding [SQUEEZE] release-notes: Please document Shorewall transition
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

545420: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=545420
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release-notes
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

Hash: SHA1

I am including the following NEWS.Debian in the new shorewall package:

shorewall ( unstable; urgency=low

  Users upgrading from Shorewall 4.0 to 4.4 (i.e., Lenny to Squeeze)
  should refer to this article for details on the upgrade process:

 -- Roberto C. Sanchez <roberto@connexer.com>  Sun, 06 Sep 2009 08:52:01 -0400

It certainly needs to also be in the Squeeze release notes.


- -Roberto

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.3
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 16:36:59 -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:

> My apologies for missing your earlier pings on this.  This document is
> available at /usr/share/doc/shorewall-doc/html/LennyToSqueeze.html in
> the shorewall-doc package.  Would that be OK?
Committed the following:

commit 172401cd4c78c8ae1dc1d0b701730d91d45a99f4
Author: jcristau <jcristau@313b444b-1b9f-4f58-a734-7bb04f332e8d>
Date:   Thu Feb 3 20:08:08 2011 +0000

    Add link to shorewall upgrade page
    Reported-by: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <roberto@connexer.com>
    Signed-off-by: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
    git-svn-id: svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/ddp/manuals/trunk/release-notes@8347 313b444b-1b9f-4f58-a734-7bb04f332e8d

diff --git a/en/issues.dbk b/en/issues.dbk
index 2a0bc11..21dcc4d 100644
--- a/en/issues.dbk
+++ b/en/issues.dbk
@@ -792,4 +792,16 @@ way to give a user administrative rights is to add it to the
+<section id="shorewall">
+  <title>Shorewall upgrade instructions</title>
+  <para>
+    Users of the <systemitem role="package">shorewall</systemitem> firewall
+    should read the instructions at <ulink
+    url="http://www.shorewall.net/LennyToSqueeze.html"; />, also available as
+    <filename>/usr/share/doc/shorewall-doc/html/LennyToSqueeze.html</filename>
+    in the <systemitem role="package">shorewall-doc</systemitem> package, upon
+    upgrading to Debian &release;.
+  </para>


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

--- End Message ---

Reply to: