[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#605373: marked as done (release-notes: Parallel booting is the default)

Your message dated Mon, 29 Nov 2010 23:33:24 +0100
with message-id <20101129223324.GC6623@javifsp.no-ip.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#605373: release-notes: Parallel booting is the default
has caused the Debian Bug report #605373,
regarding release-notes: Parallel booting is the default
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
605373: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=605373
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release-notes
Severity: normal

Section 2.1.2 incorrectly states that parallel booting is not the 
default.  The insserv package's README is currently out of date in this 
respect, see #605368.

Therefore I suggest to rewrite the last paragraph of Section 2.1.2 to

With dependency-based boot sequencing it is also now possible to run the 
boot system scripts in parallel which can, under most circumstances, 
improve the speed of the boot process. This feature is 
currently enabled by default.
To disable it specify CONCURRENCY=none in /etc/default/rcS. 
More information is
available in /usr/share/doc/insserv/README.Debian.


Best wishes,

	Gábor Braun

-- System Information:
irrelevant

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:09:37PM +0100, Braun Gábor wrote:
> Package: release-notes
> Severity: normal
> 
> Section 2.1.2 incorrectly states that parallel booting is not the 
> default.  The insserv package's README is currently out of date in this 
> respect, see #605368.

Thank you for the hint. I have corrected the section.

Regards

Javier

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: