Re: Bug#590162: maint-guide SVN SGML updated, please check ...
- To: Osamu Aoki <osamu@debian.org>
- Cc: debian-doc@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#590162: maint-guide SVN SGML updated, please check ...
- From: Serafeim Zanikolas <sez@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 18:54:13 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20100801165413.GA4006@mobee>
- In-reply-to: <20100801130331.GB22859@debian.org>
- References: <20100731000933.GA3935@debian.org> <20100731130046.GA7928@debian.org> <20100801020632.GA2664@mobee> <20100801130331.GB22859@debian.org>
Hi again,
Here's another round of mostly wording improvements off the latest svn.
-S
Index: maint-guide.en.sgml
===================================================================
--- maint-guide.en.sgml (revision 7457)
+++ maint-guide.en.sgml (working copy)
@@ -406,9 +406,10 @@
<url name="Debian QA Group" id="http://qa.debian.org/">, you may
be able to pick it up if it's still available (check the ownership status
at <url name="Debian Bug report logs: Bugs in package wnpp in unstable" id="http://bugs.debian.org/wnpp">).
- There are also some packages which their maintainers are asking "Request for Adoption" (<strong>RFA</strong>).
+ You may also adopt a package for which the corresponding maintainer has filed
+ a "Request for Adoption" (<strong>RFA</strong>).
- <p>You can find orphaned or RFA'ed packages at:
+ <p>Several different views of orphaned or RFA'ed packages are available at at:
<list>
<item><url name="Work-Needing and Prospective Packages" id="http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/">
<item><url name="Debian Packages that Need Lovin'" id="http://wnpp.debian.net/">
@@ -416,15 +417,16 @@
</list>
<p>As a side note, it's important to point out that Debian already has
- packages for most kinds of programs while available number and time
- of its developers to maintain them are fairly limited.
+ packages for most kinds of programs, and the number of packages already in
+ the Debian archive is much larger than that of contributors with upload
+ rights.
Thus, contributions to packages already in the archive are far more
appreciated (and more likely to receive sponsorship) by other developers
<footnote>Having said that, there will of course always be new programs
that are worthwhile packaging.</footnote>.
- You can do that in various ways by the following.
+ You can do that in various ways.
<list>
- <item>taking over orphaned but yet actively used packages
+ <item>taking over orphaned, yet actively used, packages
<item>joining <url name="packaging teams" id="http://wiki.debian.org/Teams">
<item>triaging bugs of very popular packages
<item>preparing <url name="QA or NMU uploads" id="http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/pkgs.html#nmu-qa-upload">
Reply to: