[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#485837: (more or less) mandate notifying d-devel of ITPs



On 13/06/08 at 00:54 +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> tags 485837 + patch
> thanks
> 
> Thomas Viehmann <tv@beamnet.de> writes:
> > Section 5.1 on New Packages currently contains the sentence
> >
> >> If you feel it's necessary, send a copy to
> >> debian-devel@lists.debian.org by putting the address in the
> >> X-Debbugs-CC: header of the message (no, don't use CC:, because that
> >> way the message's subject won't indicate the bug number).
> >
> > I wonder whether it would be preferable to make using that a (strong)
> > recommendation along the lines of
> [...]
> 
> I agree with this request. Proposed diff, please review:
> 
> Index: pkgs.dbk
> ===================================================================
> --- pkgs.dbk	(revision 5230)
> +++ pkgs.dbk	(working copy)
> @@ -28,14 +28,17 @@
>  current URL where it can be downloaded from.
>  </para>
>  <para>
> -You should set the subject of the bug to ``ITP: <replaceable>foo</replaceable>
> --- <replaceable>short description</replaceable>'', substituting the name of the
> -new package for <replaceable>foo</replaceable>.  The severity of the bug report
> -must be set to <literal>wishlist</literal>.  If you feel it's necessary, send
> -a copy to &email-debian-devel; by putting the address in the
> -<literal>X-Debbugs-CC:</literal> header of the message (no, don't use
> -<literal>CC:</literal>, because that way the message's subject won't indicate
> -the bug number).
> +You should set the subject of the bug to <literal>ITP: <replaceable>foo
> +</replaceable>-- <replaceable>short description</replaceable><literal>, 
> +substituting the name of the new package for <replaceable>foo</replaceable>.
> +The severity of the bug report must be set to <literal>wishlist</literal>.
> +Please send a copy to &email-debian-devel; by using the X-Debbugs-CC
> +header (don't use CC:, because that way the message's subject won't
> +indicate the bug number). If you are packaging so many new packages (>10)
> +that notifying the mailing list in seperate messages is too disruptive,
> +do send a summary after filing the bugs to the debian-devel list instead.
> +This will inform the other developers about upcoming packages and will
> +allow a review of your description and package name.
>  </para>
>  <para>
>  Please include a <literal>Closes:

ACK from me at least :)
-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas@nussbaum.fr             GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: