On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 03:02:03AM +0200, Jens Seidel wrote: > On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 01:02:07AM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > > [1] There is no official deadline as of yet, and potato was supported for > > a year after its release (see > > According to http://www.debian.org/security/faq#lifespan the > security team tries to support updates for about one year after the next > stable release. Oh, missed dat. > > + <item>freeciv, has been splitted into freeciv-client and freeciv-server. > > I know :-)) > > PS: At bottom of your patch you have an empty list of splitted packages :-) Yes, it's commented out. I have a partial list in my system that will use to update this info if we deem these lists useful and include them in the Release Notes. > > + <item>plex86, replaced by bochs. > > Ahm, I'm not sure about this. From Plex86 changelog: "Plex86 is dead > upstream.". Package description: > "The functionality of Plex86 in debian has been superceeded by the Bochs > package." > Bochs has a similar functionality but does it really replace plex86 > which was designed to be a VMWare clone which executes i386 code natively > in contrast to bochs which emulates everything? I know that plex86 != bochs, but the maintainer has chosen that as the upgrade path, I'm only reflecting that. > > > + <item>tuxracer, replaced by planetpenguin-racer. > > Thanks, I have to remember this. Actually, there seems to be some comments in debian-release related to this change right now. I'm ok for all the typos. As for all the suggestions in the lists I'm also OK but I wanted first to hear if it's OK for the lists to go back in. Regards Javier
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature