Emma Jane Hogbin <emmajane@xtrinsic.com> writes: > On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 04:34:18PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote: >> Not official yet, but... >> http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/debian-legal-200304/msg00246.html >> Regarding invariant sections, see #1 in the solutions of that statement. > > This was very useful, thanks! In the mean time are the only "approved" > licenses those listed in the Debian Social Contract? > http://www.debian.org/social_contract > BSD, Artistic, GPL No, those are just the most common. Also acceptable are the LGPL, the MIT license, the Mozilla Public License, public domain, and others. > I definitely like the language of the Creative Commons > Attribution-ShareAlike license. > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/1.0/ I'm not familiar with it. If you are unsure of the free-ness of a license, ask on debian-legal for someone to review it. -- Poems... always a sign of pretentious inner turmoil.
Attachment:
pgpazYOarC8oW.pgp
Description: PGP signature