Re: new debiandoc-sgml version in action ? :)
THanks but more question.
On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 01:46:07PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 12:29:56AM -0700, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > I was happy to see all DDP pages seems to be build with the newer
> > version of debiandoc-sgml from woody.
> >
> > Can someone with shell account confirm situation?
> >
> > 1) version of "debiandoc-sgml"?
>
> 1.1.99
^^ This must be 69. (unstable version, I think. testing is still 67)
Am I right? (Or did someone build 99 and installed to the host?)
debiandoc-sgml (1.1.69) unstable; urgency=low
* debian/control: removed explicit and versioned dependency on
`debianutils` to facilitate backporting to potato
(thanks Jordi Mallach <jordi@debian.org>)
-- Ardo van Rangelrooij <ardo@debian.org> Sat, 25 May 2002 11:07:44 -0500
> > 2) version of "bash"?
>
> 2.03-6
I see. Potato.
> > 3) Is machine totally tracking woody?
>
> No, I'm afraid not.
--
~\^o^/~~~ ~\^.^/~~~ ~\^*^/~~~ ~\^_^/~~~ ~\^+^/~~~ ~\^:^/~~~ ~\^v^/~~~ +++++
Osamu Aoki @ Cupertino CA USA
See "User's Guide": http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/users-guide/
See "Debian reference": http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/reference/
"Debian reference" Project at: http://qref.sf.net
I welcome your constructive criticisms and corrections.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-doc-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: