[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re^4: Documents vs. Sections



Am 30.04.98 schrieb apharris # burrito.onshore.com ...

Moin Adam!

APH> > Ok, but Links should only used for sections and not for documents.
APH> Strongly disagree.  Support why you don't want to allow documents to
APH> be present in multiple sections;

I think you don#t see it. You can of course register one document in more  
than one section. But you can not add a *link* to a document. You can add  
links only to directories. Ok?

APH> > And remember we should support URLs:
APH> >   "File: http://....";
APH> Should we?

Wasn#t that your suggestion some weeks ago? And I really like this idea.  
This is for example interesting, to add cgi Skripts to the index.

APH> wanting maybe to have 'Original-Source: http://...' pointing to an
APH> upstream, more live or possibly more up-to-date copy (i.e., say it's a
APH> dump of a faq-o-matic or something).

I think that there#re a lot of cases where http:// makes sense. Maybe we  
should have a "Format: html-link"?

APH> You're muddling section registration with document registration.  No

No. I was talking about document registrations.

cu, Marco

--
Uni: Budde@tu-harburg.de           Fido: 2:240/5202.15
Mailbox: mbudde@hqsys.antar.com    http://www.tu-harburg.de/~semb2204/


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-doc-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org


Reply to: