Re^4: Documents vs. Sections
Am 30.04.98 schrieb apharris # burrito.onshore.com ...
Moin Adam!
APH> > Ok, but Links should only used for sections and not for documents.
APH> Strongly disagree. Support why you don't want to allow documents to
APH> be present in multiple sections;
I think you don#t see it. You can of course register one document in more
than one section. But you can not add a *link* to a document. You can add
links only to directories. Ok?
APH> > And remember we should support URLs:
APH> > "File: http://....";
APH> Should we?
Wasn#t that your suggestion some weeks ago? And I really like this idea.
This is for example interesting, to add cgi Skripts to the index.
APH> wanting maybe to have 'Original-Source: http://...' pointing to an
APH> upstream, more live or possibly more up-to-date copy (i.e., say it's a
APH> dump of a faq-o-matic or something).
I think that there#re a lot of cases where http:// makes sense. Maybe we
should have a "Format: html-link"?
APH> You're muddling section registration with document registration. No
No. I was talking about document registrations.
cu, Marco
--
Uni: Budde@tu-harburg.de Fido: 2:240/5202.15
Mailbox: mbudde@hqsys.antar.com http://www.tu-harburg.de/~semb2204/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-doc-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: