Re: doc-base 0.4 and other issues
Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de> writes:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 1998 at 07:33:56AM -0400, Adam P. Harris wrote:
> > We have two major policy issues to solve immediately (although it is
> > definatly too late for hamm, of course):
> >
> > (a) standardize document registration format
> > (b) standardize document display heirarchy / index
> Please let me try to cope with (b). I already volunteered, and no
> objections till yet.
>
> I did post a lot of mails today (sorry for the delay). I will
> explain myself saturday or earlier. I try to get all under a single
> (probably big) hat.
Rock on. You won't see me object!
I assume you're writing it with debiandoc-sgml, right? Are we gearing
this for inclusion in doc-base itself? Or for inclusion in the
policy? Personally, I see it as part of doc-base, at least for as far
in the future as I can see.
Perhaps we should build doc-base out of CVS? I'm already managing
doc-base source in CVS locally. Let me know if I should contact
<debian-admin> and ask them to set up a repository at the standard
location. Perhaps a lower-overhead solution would be if you simply
emailed me drafts -- whatever is okay with me.
[Christian]
> Why do you think that two levels are too deep? Please keep in mind
> that eventually _all_ packages (nearly 2000 now) will register
> manuals, so with a single level of sections you wouldn't find any
> document!
I don't think two or three or even four are too deep. Christian, I am
a little behind in email; I think my reaction was against the *first*
proposal you made.
.....A. P. Harris...apharris@onShore.com...<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-doc-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: