[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Hard Rust requirements from May onward



On Sat, Nov 01, 2025 at 12:18:29PM +0900, Simon Richter wrote:
> Hi,
 
> On 11/1/25 06:31, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> } October 31, apt maintainer:
> } } Hello,
> } }
> } } Evolution continues, so does software development.
> } } Apt also moves forward by building/replacing compoments.
> } } That will be done with Rust.
> } } Because that impacts **all architectures** this early announcement.
> } } A half year ahead is an early announcement in my book.
> } } I say **all architectures** and I mean **all architecture**.
> } } However I fear not every architecture is fit enough to keep up.
> } } Please do understand that I choose to **not** spend energy
> } } in the conflict of interrest it causes. I prefer to move forward
> } } and hope all of us do. (I'm also happy for those
> } } who are happy with al they already have.)
> >
> > I find this particular wording rather unpleasant and very unusual to
> > what I'm used to from Debian in the past. I have to admit that I'm a
> > bit disappointed that such a confrontational approach has been chosen.
> 
> Alas, this has become the norm.

The amount of "I don't want to adapt" complains seems constant.
 

Groeten
Geert Stappers
DD
-- 
Some changes go so slow, you don't notice them.
Some changes go so fast, they don't notice you.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: