Re: [MBF]: Proposing `Rules-Requires-Root: no` being the new default

[Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org>]

This is awesome work! I hope you can start the MBF soon.

One minor comment:

>   * 862 failures
>     - Of these 217 failed with an error related to this change
>     - The remaining failed for other reasons (including running
>       out of memory on the host, etc.)

I'd like to look at those "remaining". Can you put the list somewere?

When I test for packages which fail if "some special condition is met"
(for example, make --shuffle) I usually try to do two groups: Packages which
fail with the condition and packages which would fail anyway, and I try to be
sure in which group each package is, so maybe I could try to fill the missing
gaps here.

Thanks.