Re: Moving apt (and hence bootstraps) from GnuPG to Sequioa (via gpgv-sq)

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, deity@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Moving apt (and hence bootstraps) from GnuPG to Sequioa (via gpgv-sq)
From: Antonio Russo <aerusso@aerusso.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 18:25:11 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 2d684c5e-85dc-40fe-978a-525bd4e4b613@aerusso.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Zz-x_OjO7xvTMShS@teal.hq.k1024.org>
References: <[🔎] 20241121210134.GA1768236@debian.org> <[🔎] Zz-x_OjO7xvTMShS@teal.hq.k1024.org>

On 11/21/24 15:19, Iustin Pop wrote:

I'm not happy with the heavyness that one gets via gpg just for
verifying signatures, so I'd be all for a lighter-weight solution.


gpgv is lighter weight than gpgv-sq.  Surprisingly, it's not just
the rustc-static-links-everything problem, since gpgv-static is
also smaller than gpgv-sq.

Antonio

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Moving apt (and hence bootstraps) from GnuPG to Sequioa (via gpgv-sq)
  - From: Julian Andres Klode <jak@debian.org>

References:
- Moving apt (and hence bootstraps) from GnuPG to Sequioa (via gpgv-sq)
  - From: Julian Andres Klode <jak@debian.org>
- Re: Moving apt (and hence bootstraps) from GnuPG to Sequioa (via gpgv-sq)
  - From: Iustin Pop <iustin@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Moving apt (and hence bootstraps) from GnuPG to Sequioa (via gpgv-sq)
Next by Date: Re: Kernel 6.13 & choice Init or SystemD for the user on Debian 13
Previous by thread: Re: Moving apt (and hence bootstraps) from GnuPG to Sequioa (via gpgv-sq)
Next by thread: Re: Moving apt (and hence bootstraps) from GnuPG to Sequioa (via gpgv-sq)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread