On Thu, 2024-09-26 at 01:31 +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote: > On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 09:38:26PM +0200, Bernd Schubert wrote: > > I would like to ask how painful is a library (libfuse) .so for a > > distribution? > > Not at all, if all revdeps build fine with the bumped version. > > "I'm assuming that distributions do not recompile packages against a new > library version, unless absolutely needed - if I'm right library ABI > changes cause silent issues." sounds very wrong to me. We always > recompile packages against a new soname when that is uploaded, and as we > try to keep packages uptodate a new soname is normally uploaded every time > it's bumped by the upstream. But we *don't* rebuild when there is not an soversion bump, so the previous unintended ABI changes in libfuse3-3 may well have caused silent issues for its reverse-dependencies. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings If the facts do not conform to your theory, they must be disposed of.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part