Re: Some t64 libraries already in testing; I'm confused
On 2024-03-31 Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de> wrote:
> On 2024-03-31 06:54 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > On 2024-03-30 Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> wrote:
[...]
> >> Looking through testing, I see the following t64 libraries present:
> >> libaio1t64
> >> libfyba0t64
> >> libglibmm-2.68-1t64
> >> libnetcdf19t64
> >> libudns0t64
> >> libczmq4t64 (virtual package; libczmq4 provides this)
> > I have not checked all the others (libczmq4: "Undo 4.2.1-1.1. There are
> > only 3 symbols with time_t, and they are not used in the distribution.
> > Avoid to carry the package rename forever."), but suspect they are
> > similar.
> Unfortunately the other four are not similar, but rather lacked a build
> dependency on dpkg-dev (>= 1.22.5) which would have prevented their
> migration to testing. Testing users on armel and armhf should avoid
> installing them and downgrade to the pre-t64 version if necessary.
All of those noted above except udns have already been fixed in sid.
cu Andreas
--
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'
Reply to: