Re: Re: time_t progress report
Simon McVittie, le dim. 24 mars 2024 11:59:50 +0000, a ecrit:
> On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 at 12:56:52 +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> > 2. FTBFSing packages (those that block further work, anyway)
> ...
> > An example of a currently existing obstacle of this kind is snapd-glib
> > (mainly because it blocks pipewire).
>
> For the specific example of pipewire, I've suggested temporarily
> dropping that feature from pipewire on the affected architectures
> <https://bugs.debian.org/1067558> which would get the rebuilds further
> along (particularly if it unblocks weston, which lots of packages use
> in their tests). There are various places where targeted changes like
> this can unblock a whole tree of dependencies.
Could we use build profiles for this? That'd avoid full uploads, and
document for architecture bootstrapping.
Samuel
Reply to: