[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
] [
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
] [
Date Index
] [
Thread Index
]
Re: 64-bit time_t transition: cargo needs manual intervention
To
: Steven Robbins <
steve@sumost.ca
>
Cc
:
1065787@bugs.debian.org
, Debian Developers <
debian-devel@lists.debian.org
>
Subject
: Re: 64-bit time_t transition: cargo needs manual intervention
From
: Otto Kekäläinen <
otto@kekalainen.net
>
Date
: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0700
Message-id
: <
[🔎]
CAOU6tAAVuh7cvCOiqqWyuSV2WvD_XdWi7Jgrmw1azwizpZpB6w@mail.gmail.com
>
In-reply-to
: <
[🔎]
2943827.Lt9SDvczpP@riemann
>
References
: <8fbbdb9c-647a-44bd-dcd2-56aa5dd69b3e@debian.org> <
[🔎]
2943827.Lt9SDvczpP@riemann
>
Hi!
Is anyone perhaps planning to fix cargo?
For example curl isn't building on armel/armhf now and numerous packages that depend of curl are not building on armel/armhf.
Thanks in advance to the person who steps up.
Reply to:
debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Otto Kekäläinen (on-list)
Otto Kekäläinen (off-list)
Follow-Ups
:
Re: 64-bit time_t transition: cargo needs manual intervention
From:
Fabian Grünbichler <debian@fabian.gruenbichler.email>
Re: 64-bit time_t transition: cargo needs manual intervention
From:
Wookey <wookey@wookware.org>
Re: 64-bit time_t transition: cargo needs manual intervention
From:
Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>
References
:
64-bit time_t transition: cargo needs manual intervention
From:
Steven Robbins <steve@sumost.ca>
Prev by Date:
Re: Package marked for autoremoval due to closed bug?
Next by Date:
Re: Package marked for autoremoval due to closed bug?
Previous by thread:
Re: 64-bit time_t transition: cargo needs manual intervention
Next by thread:
Re: 64-bit time_t transition: cargo needs manual intervention
Index(es):
Date
Thread