Re: How to ask efficiently for removal of 32 bit architectures of about 40 packages (Was: reverse dependenc)
Hi Mattia,
Am Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 11:35:55PM +0100 schrieb Mattia Rizzolo:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 09:12:30PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > I hope there is some better solution than sending single bug reports
> > for those packages. If ftpmaster tooling really needs single bug
> > reports I wonder how I can automatically create such bug reports with
> > always the same text, just targeting at different binary packages.
> >
> > This also should include some means to work around the less than 5
> > bug reports per hour SPAM protection means of BTS.
>
>
> clone the bug however many time you need and retitle the clones? What
> matters for the ftp tooling is just the bug title, pretty much.
> That's one single email...
I admit I love this hint and tried to follow it first by this mail
https://lists.debian.org/debian-r/2024/03/msg00006.html
To: submit@bugs.debian.org, Debian R <debian-r@lists.debian.org>
where I received the response "Package is missing" from BTS. So I
simply tried to send this to some existing bug
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063376#53
by bouncing it to 1063376@bugs.debian.org
Seems I did not understood BTS syntax and something is missing since
nothing seems to happen regarding creation of new bugs.
Any hint what might be wrong here?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: