Re: clustalw lost in debian/dists/sid/main/binary-i386/Packages.{gx}z ?
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 01:06:49PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Yes, I've filed this and this was perfectly intended (even if I forgot
> that the bug is done meanwhile which I should have checked before asking
> here - sorry about this). It was just that all signs that this package
> exists are remaining and its just missing in the Packages file. So
> removing a package just means droping it from Packages file and all
> other things are cleaned up later on?
"rmadison clustalw" shows:
clustalw | 2.1+lgpl-6 | oldoldstable | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
clustalw | 2.1+lgpl-7 | oldstable | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
clustalw | 2.1+lgpl-7 | stable | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
clustalw | 2.1+lgpl-7 | testing | source, amd64, arm64, mips64el, ppc64el, s390x
clustalw | 2.1+lgpl-7 | unstable | source, amd64, arm64, mips64el, ppc64el, s390x
clustalw | 2.1+lgpl-7 | unstable-debug | source
clustalw | 2.1+lgpl-7+b1 | unstable | riscv64
So since clustalw/2.1+lgpl-7/i386 is still in oldstable and stable, it
has to be kept in the pool; files are only expired from the pool once
they're no longer referenced anywhere. (And yes, I think there's a
delay between removing references from index files and removing the
actual pool files, to avoid mirroring race conditions.)
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwatson@debian.org]
Reply to: