On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 08:50:59PM +0100, Micha Lenk wrote: > >> You recently uploaded openssl 3.1.5-1.1. > >> > >> Are you tracking the effect it had on reverse dependencies? > >That's just a part of the time64 transition and it's definitely tracked by > >people. > > > Yet I wonder how I as a maintainer of a (transitive) reverse dependency > can assist in any meaningful way. Are we supposed to do something about > the current situation? Or is some central piece already being worked on > and no parallel, shared maintenance possible? If the only thing your package need is a binNMU or even nothing then you don't need to do anything. -- WBR, wRAR
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature