[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
] [
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
] [
Date Index
] [
Thread Index
]
Re: time_t transition and bugs
To
: Debian Developers <
debian-devel@lists.debian.org
>, Steve Langasek <
vorlon@debian.org
>
Subject
: Re: time_t transition and bugs
From
: Otto Kekäläinen <
otto@debian.org
>
Date
: Sun, 3 Mar 2024 22:14:41 -0800
Message-id
: <
[🔎]
CAOU6tABsKTo8WGgVehXYXxWqsT6dRZLHXG9RNBN3omqLGXwFpQ@mail.gmail.com
>
In-reply-to
: <
[🔎]
ZeTsXqu1HB+dN+ni@homer.dodds.net
>
References
: <
[🔎]
fed7fb3f-7210-4130-a42f-c8eeb629d8ec@aerusso.net
> <
[🔎]
ZeNj3eEUcueoCrAI@belkar.wrar.name
> <
[🔎]
ZeTsXqu1HB+dN+ni@homer.dodds.net
>
Thanks Steve for uploading a fixed curl on Saturday. Just checking did you notice amel/armhf are still not building due to secondary issues and n dependencies?
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=curl
Reply to:
debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Otto Kekäläinen (on-list)
Otto Kekäläinen (off-list)
References
:
time_t transition and bugs
From:
Antonio Russo <aerusso@aerusso.net>
Re: time_t transition and bugs
From:
Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org>
Re: time_t transition and bugs
From:
Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
Prev by Date:
Re: dpkg --verify not helpful?
Next by Date:
Re: New requirements for APT repository signing
Previous by thread:
Re: time_t transition and bugs
Next by thread:
[Summary]: Another take on package relationship substvars
Index(es):
Date
Thread