On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 04:36:43PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > Hi! > On Mon, 2024-02-19 at 19:48:38 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > I have coordinated with the gcc maintainer so that we can have the default > > flags in gcc-13 changed this week. > > We are therefore targeting Friday for the mass NMUs to unstable though there > > is a possibility this won't start until as late as Monday depending on > > capacity. > Yesterday while trying to get a time for today's upload, I discussed > with Matthias, and it looks like today is not great for timing. There > are some things that might need to be hammered out in gcc, and Matthias > was not going to be available today until next week or so. I also just > realized the transition exceptions coverage does not match between > what some porters expect (f.ex. hurd-i386 which I'll discuss with them > later today), what dpkg and debhelper have implemented and what gcc > does, I'll discuss the latter with Matthias separately. > So as mentioned by Steve, this might need to be postponed a tiny bit > more. Yes, it looks like we're not quite ready to go. There are also some bad NMUs in experimental that need to be cleaned up, and also a few extra annotations we're going to have to add to some packages after belatedly realizing that debhelper magic isn't already DTRT as far as Provides: for all packages. So we'll use the time well until gcc is ready to go. In the meantime, another happy update on the statistics, showing that we've whittled away a few more libraries: - 1093+50=1143 source packages to be transitioned - 5261+180=5441 packages to be binNMUed -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/ slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature