Re: Changes to abi=+time64 behavior (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition in progress)
Hi,
On Fri, 2024-02-09 at 15:24 +0000, Bill Allombert wrote:
> when introducing a new soname (no just a new package name), then one
> should move to time64 even on i386 ?
If you know all consumers of the package will be using appropriate
compiler flags to get 64-bit time_t, then this is fine.
Otherwise provider and consumer would disagree about ABI and likely not
work fully correct.
> But fundamentally, how do we know how third-party binaries are
> compiled ?
They have to use `dpkg-buildflags` with equivalent ABI settings.
Ansgar
Reply to: