Re: transition announcement: gsfonts + gsfonts-x11 -> fonts-urw-base35
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Hi Vincent,
Am Sonntag, dem 04.09.2022 um 01:24 +0200 schrieb Vincent Lefevre:
> As this is now in unstable, shouldn't bugs be reported to packages
> that recommend gsfonts or gsfonts-x11 so that they change them to
> fonts-urw-base35? Otherwise one cannot remove gsfonts and gsfonts-x11
> without a complaint, such as
just sent out the bug reports. Thanks for the reminder!
- Fabian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=pdZr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: