Re: Bug#1016130: ITP: asdf -- multiple language runtime version manager
On Sun, 2022-08-07 at 08:04 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Matt Barry <matt@hazelmollusk.org> writes:
>
> > I'm not really opposed to using asdf-vm if that prevents genuine
> > ambiguity. Are any of these packages a) packaged for Debian, b)
> > provide
> > a binary called 'asdf'?
>
> python-asdf, cl-asdf, and asdftool are all packaged for Debian. None
> of
> them so far as I can tell produce a binary called asdf, but cl-asdf
> does
> have an info page named asdf, so there's some potential for confusion
> there. (cl-asdf and python-asdf narrowly avoid having a conflict
> over
> info pages already.)
Thanks, that's good to know; I think that at the very least naming this
package asdf-vm makes sense.
Cheers,
Matt
Reply to: